Ask Carole

Welcome! I created this blog to answer some of the questions people have been asking about the CTA's funding situation. We on the board have asked many of these same questions, and we want to help get the word out. So please feel free to send comments or questions to CTAboard@transitchicago.com, and check back regularly for answers and updates to our efforts to increase transit funding. -- Carole

My Photo
Name: Carole Brown
Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States

Friday, August 31, 2007

Rally and Vote

Rep. Hamos and her transit-oriented House colleagues were very busy this past Tuesday and Wednesday.

Tuesday's (very hot) rally in support of transit outside the Thompson Center was very heartening—it reflected the broad and diverse regional coalition built over the past few years to move forward on a [an equitable and] sustainable funding solution for mass transit. Standing with me on the stage was President Huberman, RTA Chairman Jim Reilly, Mayor Daley, Speaker Madigan, DuPage County Chairman Bob Schillerstrom, Rep. Julie Hamos, Rep. Sid Mathias, and many, many others (I couldn’t count all the familiar faces on the stage). If you were there, thank you for showing your support.

The message I took from the rally was that a strong and sustainable transit system is not a luxury our region enjoys, it’s a necessity our region can’t live without. And with September 16th (and then the 2008 budget process) fast approaching, everyone knows it’s at very real and imminent risk right now.

On a more positive note, Wednesday the House Rules Committee met to consider House Amendment 4 to Senate Bill 572. The Amendment, which passed 15 to 4, makes some technical pension-specific and governance changes to the SB 572. I’m told that the full bill can now move to the floor of the House for an expected vote in Springfield on September 4. If it passes the House, it then would need to be called for a vote by Senate President Jones and then would be offered to the Governor for his signature. So the legislative process of transit funding reform continues apace.

With the show of support for transit Tuesday, and the progress on SB 572 Wednesday, I’m confident that the importance of a healthy Metra, CTA and Pace—and the transportation needs of our customers—is front and center in lawmakers’ minds.

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

Service cuts and fare increases

Today is a day that we hoped would never come. Although I remain optimistic that state lawmakers will provide increased transit funding, I am disappointed that we are forced today to put our employees and customers through the uncertainty of planning for service cuts and fare increases.

Every day on this blog and every month at our board meetings we hear from customers who want more service and improved reliability. At four public hearings in May and June, the CTA board heard from hundreds of people who took time out of their busy lives to tell us how important CTA is to their communities. Hundreds more wrote, called, and emailed us with their concerns.

In particular, we heard concerns that eliminating bus routes would strand people with no other means of transportation. They would have no way to get to work, to school, or to their health care providers. We heard the voices of people who struggle to make ends meet each month. They are not business leaders or editorial writers or political gadflies for whom an extra $2 a day is a minimal change. For many of our customers, the proposed fare increase would be a significant hit to their household budget. And we heard from our seniors, students, and disabled customers, living on fixed incomes. Doubling their passes would be devastating.

Unfortunately, it is beyond the CTA board's power to avoid service cuts and fare increases altogether. After a full generation of shrinking funding, the money and the band-aids have run out.

But Ron and I did talk about ways to address the concerns our customers raised about the plan. I asked him to go back and take another look at the May recommendation, with a request to do everything we possibly could to mitigate the impact on our transit-dependent customers.

You can read more details about the plan in the contingent fare and service changes, the press release , and Ron's presentation to the Board.

Although revised slightly, the service cuts and fare increases will still have a major impact on our region's economy. We will still take precious capital dollars away from critical infrastructure projects to keep the trains and buses running, and - here's the worst part - if Springfield doesn't act, we will be back at the end of September preparing another deeper round of cuts for 2008.

I am confident that state lawmakers understand the importance of RTA, Metra, Pace, and CTA to this region, but I also know that transit is just one of many other issues with which they are wrestling. I remain hopeful, but I regret that our customers and employees must face this uncertainty.

Tuesday, August 07, 2007

Slow Zone Elimination Project

Readers of this blog deserve a lot of credit for pushing to fix slow zones, and for demanding more information. In July the CTA board approved funding to replace ties in the Blue and Red subway tunnels as part of a broader effort to tackle slow zones.


At long last, CTA slow zone information has been consolidated in one place, and we will continue to work to improve our communications with you about this important effort.

Click here for the latest.

FREE hit counter and Internet traffic statistics from freestats.com